Obama Hammers McCain, Bush on Economy, Gas Prices

RALEIGH, N.C.Democrat Barack Obama on Monday seized on heightened concerns about the economy, tying John McCain to the Bush administration’s recent record of soaring gasoline prices and slumping employment.
Launching a two-week economics tour in a state the GOP usually considers safe, Obama warned that McCain’s policies on taxes, spending and energy would continue the nation’s slump, which some fear is already a recession. He called for new taxes on oil companies and wealthy individuals, along with $1,000 tax cuts for most working families.

With the presidential general election now fully engaged, McCain pushed back, saying Obama’s bid to end the administration’s tax cuts for upper-income earners would only worsen the economy. He is airing TV ads in key states on the Iraq war, which he sees as a better issue this fall. But he took questions on the economy from donors in Virginia on Monday, and planned a speech Tuesday to small-business owners in Washington.

With many voters blaming Bush for the economic woes, Republican candidates for federal and state offices are scrambling to distance themselves from the bad news without abandoning core principles such as low taxes and modest government intervention in activities like banking and lending.

Democrats are trying to cut off any escape routes.

The centerpiece of McCain’s economic plan “amounts to a full-throated endorsement of George Bush’s policies,” Obama told about 900 people in Raleigh.

North Carolina is not a state ordinarily pursued by Democratic presidential nominees. But it gave Obama a crucial victory in his primary battle against Hillary Rodham Clinton, and he hopes to put it in play this fall — or at least force McCain to spend time and money here.

In the audience was former presidential rival John Edwards, who lives nearby. His wife, Elizabeth Edwards — who refrained from endorsing Obama when her husband did so last month — also attended.

Obama offered no new policies in his speech, which he read from teleprompters. Rather, he used the occasion to emphasize his economic differences with McCain and summarize earlier proposals. They include raising income taxes on wealthy individuals, granting a $1,000 tax cut to most others, winding down the Iraq war, tightening credit card regulations and pumping more money into education, alternative fuels and infrastructure such as roads and bridges.

Obama took part of his speech from headlines across the nation, noting that the average price of gas just hit $4 a gallon for the first time. The news followed an unusually sharp spike in the unemployment rate on Friday.

Repeatedly linking McCain to Bush, Obama said, “our president sacrificed investments in health care, and education, and energy and infrastructure on the altar of tax breaks for big corporations and wealthy CEOs.”

Obama criticized McCain for originally opposing Bush’s first-term tax cuts but now supporting their continuation. He said he would place a windfall profits tax on oil companies while McCain would reduce their taxes.

“At a time when we’re fighting two wars, when millions of Americans can’t afford their medical bills or their tuition bills, when we’re paying more than $4 a gallon for gas, the man who rails against government spending wants to spend $1.2 billion on a tax break for Exxon Mobil,” Obama said. “That isn’t just irresponsible. It’s outrageous.”

In a conference call with reporters, Doug Holtz-Eakin, an economic adviser to McCain, said of the claim: “I presume that they’re attributing that to the basic, across-the-board corporate rate cut that’s necessary to keep the American corporate sector competitive in the global economy and jobs in America.”

At a fundraiser in Richmond, Va., McCain noted that he supports a temporary suspension of the federal tax on gasoline, which Obama dismisses as a gimmick that will not bring down prices.

“Talk to somebody who owns a couple of trucks and makes a living with those trucks,” McCain said. “Ask them whether they’d like to have some relief — 18 1/2 cents per gallon for gasoline and 24 1/2 cents for diesel. They say it matters.”

The two differed somewhat on energy production as well. Obama called for greater government investments “in a renewable energy policy that ends our addiction on foreign oil, provides real long-term relief from high fuel costs and builds a green economy that could create up to five million well-paying jobs that can’t be outsourced.”

He did not mention nuclear power, although in the past he has said he would not rule out a greater role for nuclear energy.

McCain was more gung-ho about nuclear power and expanded domestic drilling for oil and natural gas. When a donor in Richmond summed up his advice as, “nuclear, and drill wherever we’ve got it,” McCain responded: “You just gave my speech. Thank you, my friend.”

McCain added, “Long-term, we’ve got to become used to nuclear, wind, solar, tide, all of the alternate energy, including a battery that will take a car 100 miles or 200 miles” before being recharged.

“Nuclear power, for all kinds of reasons, needs to be part of the solution,” McCain said.

Obama said he would pay for all of his new proposals from sources including the higher taxes on the wealthy and an end to the Iraq war. His aides said he will provide more details as the campaign goes on.

The AFL-CIO, the nation’s largest labor organization, plans to help Obama by having its members protest Bush and McCain at gas stations around the country. Starting in Indianapolis, union members will hold signs saying “Bush & McCain Love Big Oil” and complain about a McCain tax proposal they say would give the five largest oil companies $3.8 billion in tax breaks.

source:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080610/ap_on_el_pr/candidates_economy;_ylt=Aq9.2K7VAPq4KuHdqARSnpyyFz4D

2 Comments »

  1. James said

    $1.5 trillion mess forced upon American tax payers by the CEOs of Fannie May and Freddie Mac are economic advisers to Barack Obama. In addition, Obama is the “largest recipient of political funds from mortgage giants Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae.”

    Think about it, just look how Obama’s economic advisers, CEOs Franklin Raines and James Johnson, ran Fannie and Freddie into the ground. This whilst forcing more debt, in the trillions, upon tax payers meaning higher taxes for Americans.

    The Democrat controlled congress just helped in causing this financial meltdown. Before the Democrats controlled congress the US economy was strong, but ever since then the economy has been heading downwards.

    The Democrats control all branches of government except the executive branch. Do we really need more of the same Democrat agenda? Do Americans really want more socialism that creates bigger government, more government spending, and higher taxes that ultimately gives more control of government over the people??

    How often do you think a lawyer turn preacher politician lies? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMUgNg7aD8M

  2. wannastrongnation said

    I find it pitiful that anyone can blame the Democrats for causing the economic meltdown we’re witnessing (hey duh, it’s the whole world, not just the United States)! I don’t know what planet one has been on to say our economy was “strong” before the Democrats gained a very small margin in Congress this year.
    This meltdown was created by a GOP idiot President and GOP controlled congress (from 1996 to 2007 – you forgot the GOP “Contract with America”?)! I think we all missed the part of the contract that made the rich richer and the poor poorer.
    It was this GOP controlled government that removed the regulations put in place by obviously more intelligent people than our current batch, to prevent exactly what is happening now.
    Do you like your “Free Market” today? Greenspan was dumbfounded that these grossly overpaid CEO’s would do what they did. Not only he, but all of us are wondering how they could drive the world economy into the dirt and still expect huge salaries and bonuses and look down on all of us with impunity and saying it wasn’t their fault.
    A great GOP philosophy – blame everone else and accept no accountability for the mess that has been created. At least Greenspan stated his 40 year economic philosophy was flawed, even though he found it hard to believe greed will always overcome what should be basic common sense!
    So in closing, I hardly think the Democrats have created this mess in the few months they have been the majority because they don’t CONTROL the congress! Oh that’s right, you forgot the Idiot has vetoed anything the Democrats were trying to do and their majority is too slim to stop a Filabuster by their GOP counterparts. That’s OK, selective memory is another great GOP trait (I thought elephants had great memories)!!

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a comment